Catalogue Number
BN-O1579
Analysis Method
HPLC,NMR,MS
Specification
98%(HPLC)
Storage
-20℃
Molecular Weight
446.7
Appearance
Powder
Botanical Source
This product is isolated and purified from the herbs of Walsura robusta
Structure Type
Steroids
Category
Standards;Natural Pytochemical;API
SMILES
CCC(CCC(C)C1C(CC2C1(CCC3C2C(C=C4C3(CCC(C4)O)C)O)C)O)C(C)C
Synonyms
Stigmast-5-ene-3,7,16-triol
IUPAC Name
(8S,9S,10R,13S,14S,17R)-17-[(2R,5R)-5-ethyl-6-methylheptan-2-yl]-10,13-dimethyl-2,3,4,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-dodecahydro-1H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthrene-3,7,16-triol
Density
1.1±0.1 g/cm3
Solubility
Soluble in Chloroform,Dichloromethane,Ethyl Acetate,DMSO,Acetone,etc.
Flash Point
232.9±24.7 °C
Boiling Point
566.2±50.0 °C at 760 mmHg
Melting Point
InChl
InChI=1S/C29H50O3/c1-7-19(17(2)3)9-8-18(4)27-25(32)16-23-26-22(11-13-29(23,27)6)28(5)12-10-21(30)14-20(28)15-24(26)31/h15,17-19,21-27,30-32H,7-14,16H2,1-6H3/t18-,19-,21?,22+,23+,24?,25?,26-,27+,28+,29+/m1/s1
InChl Key
GSNYNPKRIFCZGN-DZBXCDHOSA-N
WGK Germany
RID/ADR
HS Code Reference
2933990000
Personal Projective Equipment
Correct Usage
For Reference Standard and R&D, Not for Human Use Directly.
Meta Tag
provides coniferyl ferulate(CAS#:289056-24-2) MSDS, density, melting point, boiling point, structure, formula, molecular weight etc. Articles of coniferyl ferulate are included as well.>> amp version: coniferyl ferulate
No Technical Documents Available For This Product.
23818817
The turn of the new millennium was accompanied by a particularly diverse group of burned area datasets from different sensors in the Canadian boreal forests, brought together in a year of low global fire activity. This paper provides an assessment of spatial and temporal accuracy, by means of a fire-by-fire comparison of the following: two burned area datasets obtained from SPOT-VEGETATION (VGT) imagery, a MODIS Collection 5 burned area dataset, and three different datasets obtained from NOAA-AVHRR. Results showed that burned area data from MODIS provided accurate dates of burn but great omission error, partially caused by calibration problems. One of the VGT-derived datasets (L3JRC) represented the largest number of fire sites in spite of its great overall underestimation, whereas the GBA2000 dataset achieved the best burned area quantification, both showing delayed and very variable fire timing. Spatial accuracy was comparable between the 5 km and the 1 km AVHRR-derived datasets but was remarkably lower in the 8 km dataset leading, us to conclude that at higher spatial resolutions, temporal accuracy was lower. The probable methodological and contextual causes of these differences were analyzed in detail.
A Comparative Analysis of Burned Area Datasets in Canadian Boreal Forest in 2000
Laia NúNez-Casillas, 1 ,* Jose Rafael Garcia Lazaro, 2 Jose Andres Moreno-Ruiz, 2 and Manuel Arbelo 1
2013;
Description :
Empty ...
