We Offer Worldwide Shipping
Login Wishlist

3-(2-Hydroxy-4,6-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-1-propanone

$672

  • Brand : BIOFRON

  • Catalogue Number : BD-P0455

  • Specification : 98.0%(HPLC)

  • CAS number : 151752-07-7

  • Formula : C17H18O5

  • Molecular Weight : 302.32

  • PUBCHEM ID : 42607735

  • Volume : 5mg

Available on backorder

Quantity
Checkout Bulk Order?

Catalogue Number

BD-P0455

Analysis Method

HPLC,NMR,MS

Specification

98.0%(HPLC)

Storage

2-8°C

Molecular Weight

302.32

Appearance

Powder

Botanical Source

Structure Type

Chalcones/Dihydrochalcones

Category

SMILES

COC1=CC(=C(C(=C1)OC)CCC(=O)C2=CC=C(C=C2)O)O

Synonyms

3-(2-hydroxy-4,6-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propan-1-one

IUPAC Name

3-(2-hydroxy-4,6-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propan-1-one

Applications

Density

1.2±0.1 g/cm3

Solubility

Soluble in Chloroform,Dichloromethane,Ethyl Acetate,DMSO,Acetone,etc.

Flash Point

196.7±23.6 °C

Boiling Point

532.7±50.0 °C at 760 mmHg

Melting Point

InChl

InChI=1S/C17H18O5/c1-21-13-9-16(20)14(17(10-13)22-2)7-8-15(19)11-3-5-12(18)6-4-11/h3-6,9-10,18,20H,7-8H2,1-2H3

InChl Key

KTMWYIVORZZVMV-UHFFFAOYSA-N

WGK Germany

RID/ADR

HS Code Reference

2933990000

Personal Projective Equipment

Correct Usage

For Reference Standard and R&D, Not for Human Use Directly.

Meta Tag

provides coniferyl ferulate(CAS#:151752-07-7) MSDS, density, melting point, boiling point, structure, formula, molecular weight etc. Articles of coniferyl ferulate are included as well.>> amp version: coniferyl ferulate

No Technical Documents Available For This Product.

PMID

29755287

KEYWORDS

Crowdfunding, Content analysis, Persuasion, Empirical study, Predictive model

Title

Project description and crowdfunding success: an exploratory study

Author

Mi (Jamie) Zhou,corresponding author1 Baozhou Lu,2 Weiguo (Patrick) Fan,1 and G. Alan Wang1

Publish date

2018;

PMID

28901590

Abstract

Health is well known to show a clear gradient by occupation. Although it may appear evident that occupation can affect health, there are multiple possible sources of selection that can generate a strong association, other than simply a causal effect of occupation on health. We link job characteristics to German panel data spanning 29 years to characterize occupations by their physical and psychosocial burden. Employing a dynamic model to control for factors that simultaneously affect health and selection into occupation, we find that selection into occupation accounts for at least 60% of the association. The effects of occupational characteristics such as physical strain and low job control are negative and increase with age: late‐career exposure to 1 year of high physical strain and low job control is comparable to the average health decline from ageing 16 and 6 months, respectively.

KEYWORDS

dynamic models, occupational stressors

Title

The wear and tear on health: What is the role of occupation?

Author

Bastian Ravesteijn,corresponding author 1 , 2 , 3 Hans van Kippersluis, 1 , 5 and Eddy van Doorslaer 1 , 4 , 5

Publish date

2018 Feb;