We Offer Worldwide Shipping
Login Wishlist

3-(3-Hydroxybutyl)phenol

$832

  • Brand : BIOFRON

  • Catalogue Number : BN-O0920

  • Specification : 98%(HPLC)

  • CAS number : 854464-95-2

  • Formula : C10H14O2

  • Molecular Weight : 166.22

  • Volume : 5mg

Available on backorder

Quantity
Checkout Bulk Order?

Catalogue Number

BN-O0920

Analysis Method

HPLC,NMR,MS

Specification

98%(HPLC)

Storage

2-8°C

Molecular Weight

166.22

Appearance

Oil

Botanical Source

Structure Type

Phenols

Category

Standards;Natural Pytochemical;API

SMILES

C1C2=CC=CC=C2C#CC3=CC=CC=C3N1C(=O)CCC(=O)NCCOCCOCCOCCNC(=O)CCOCC(COCCC(=O)NCCOCCOCCOCCNC(=O)CCC(=O)N4CC5=CC=CC=C5C#CC6=CC=CC=C64)NC(=O)CCN7C(=O)C=CC7=O

Synonyms

3-(3-Hydroxybutyl)phenol/Benzenepropanol, 3-hydroxy-α-methyl-

IUPAC Name

Density

1.1±0.1 g/cm3

Solubility

Soluble in Chloroform,Dichloromethane,Ethyl Acetate,DMSO,Acetone,etc.

Flash Point

154.5±15.5 °C

Boiling Point

317.1±17.0 °C at 760 mmHg

Melting Point

InChl

InChI=1S/C70H84N8O17/c79-62(21-23-69(86)77-49-57-13-3-1-9-53(57)17-19-55-11-5-7-15-60(55)77)71-30-37-88-41-45-92-47-43-90-39-32-73-64(81)28-35-94-51-59(75-66(83)27-34-76-67(84)25-26-68(76)85)52-95-36-29-65(82)74-33-40-91-44-48-93-46-42-89-38-31-72-63(80)22-24-70(87)78-50-58-14-4-2-10-54(58)18-20-56-12-6-8-16-61(56)78/h1-16,25-26,59H,21-24,27-52H2,(H,71,79)(H,72,80)(H,73,81)(H,74,82)(H,75,83)

InChl Key

YVRVBZDYHPVZNT-UHFFFAOYSA-N

WGK Germany

RID/ADR

HS Code Reference

2933990000

Personal Projective Equipment

Correct Usage

For Reference Standard and R&D, Not for Human Use Directly.

Meta Tag

provides coniferyl ferulate(CAS#:854464-95-2) MSDS, density, melting point, boiling point, structure, formula, molecular weight etc. Articles of coniferyl ferulate are included as well.>> amp version: coniferyl ferulate

No Technical Documents Available For This Product.

PMID

31818308

Abstract

Background
Fluoride from environmental sources accumulates preferentially in the pineal gland which produces melatonin, the hormone that regulates the sleep-wake cycle. However, the effects of fluoride on sleep regulation remain unknown. This population-based study examined whether chronic low-level fluoride exposure is associated with sleep patterns and daytime sleepiness among older adolescents in the United States (US).

Method
This cross-sectional study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2015-2016). We analyzed data from adolescents who had plasma fluoride (n = 473) and water fluoride (n = 419) measures and were not prescribed medication for sleep disorders. Relationships between fluoride exposure and self-reported sleep patterns or daytime sleepiness were examined using survey-weighted linear, binomial logistic or multinomial logistic regression after covariate adjustment. A Holm-Bonferroni correction accounted for multiple comparisons.

Results
The average age of adolescents was 17 years (range = 16-19). Median (IQR) water and plasma fluoride concentrations were 0.27 (0.52) mg/L and 0.29 (0.19) μmol/L respectively. An IQR increase in water fluoride was associated with 1.97 times higher odds of reporting symptoms suggestive of sleep apnea (95% CI: 1.27, 3.05; p = 0.02), a 24 min later bedtime (B = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.70; p = 0.05), a 26 min later morning wake time (B = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.73; p = 0.04), and among males, a 38% reduction in the odds of reporting snoring (95% CI: 0.45, 0.87, p = 0.03).

Conclusions
Fluoride exposure may contribute to changes in sleep cycle regulation and sleep behaviors among older adolescents in the US. Additional prospective studies are warranted to examine the effects of fluoride on sleep patterns and determine critical windows of vulnerability for potential effects.

KEYWORDS

Fluoride, Sleep, Sleep apnea, Adolescents, United States

Title

Fluoride exposure and sleep patterns among older adolescents in the United States: a cross-sectional study of NHANES 2015-2016

Author

Ashley J. Malin,corresponding author1 Sonali Bose,2,3 Stefanie A. Busgang,1 Chris Gennings,1 Michael Thorpy,4 Robert O. Wright,1,2 Rosalind J. Wright,2 and Manish Arora1

Publish date

2019;

PMID

24717437

Abstract

Meiotic recombination promotes genetic diversification as well as pairing and segregation of homologous chromosomes, but the double-strand breaks (DSBs) that initiate recombination are dangerous lesions that can cause mutation or meiotic failure. How cells control DSBs to balance between beneficial and deleterious outcomes is not well understood. This study tests the hypothesis that DSB control involves a network of intersecting negative regulatory circuits. Using multiple complementary methods, we show that DSBs form in greater numbers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells lacking ZMM proteins, a suite of recombination-promoting factors traditionally regarded as acting strictly downstream of DSB formation. ZMM-dependent DSB control is genetically distinct from a pathway tying break formation to meiotic progression through the Ndt80 transcription factor. These counterintuitive findings suggest that homologous chromosomes that have successfully engaged one another stop making breaks. Genome-wide DSB maps uncover distinct responses by different subchromosomal domains to the zmm mutation zip3, and show that Zip3 is required for the previously unexplained tendency of DSB density to vary with chromosome size. Thus, feedback tied to ZMM function contributes in unexpected ways to spatial patterning of recombination.

Title

Homologue engagement controls meiotic DNA break number and distribution

Author

Drew Thacker,1,2 Neeman Mohibullah,1,3 Xuan Zhu,1,2 and Scott Keeney1,2,3

Publish date

2014 Dec 12.

PMID

24367271

Abstract

During meiosis, repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by recombination promotes pairing of homologous chromosomes and their connection by crossovers. Two DNA strand-exchange proteins, Rad51 and Dmc1, are required for meiotic recombination in many organisms. Studies in budding yeast imply that Rad51 acts to regulate Dmc1’s strand exchange activity, while its own exchange activity is inhibited. However, in a dmc1 mutant, elimination of inhibitory factor, Hed1, activates Rad51’s strand exchange activity and results in high levels of recombination without participation of Dmc1. Here we show that Rad51-mediated meiotic recombination is not subject to regulatory processes associated with high-fidelity chromosome segregation. These include homolog bias, a process that directs strand exchange between homologs rather than sister chromatids. Furthermore, activation of Rad51 does not effectively substitute for Dmc1’s chromosome pairing activity, nor does it ensure formation of the obligate crossovers required for accurate homolog segregation. We further show that Dmc1’s dominance in promoting strand exchange between homologs involves repression of Rad51’s strand-exchange activity. This function of Dmc1 is independent of Hed1, but requires the meiotic kinase, Mek1. Hed1 makes a relatively minor contribution to homolog bias, but nonetheless this is important for normal morphogenesis of synaptonemal complexes and efficient crossing-over especially when DSB numbers are decreased. Super-resolution microscopy shows that Dmc1 also acts to organize discrete complexes of a Mek1 partner protein, Red1, into clusters along lateral elements of synaptonemal complexes; this activity may also contribute to homolog bias. Finally, we show that when interhomolog bias is defective, recombination is buffered by two feedback processes, one that increases the fraction of events that yields crossovers, and a second that we propose involves additional DSB formation in response to defective homolog interactions. Thus, robust crossover homeostasis is conferred by integrated regulation at initiation, strand-exchange and maturation steps of meiotic recombination.

Title

Meiotic Crossover Control by Concerted Action of Rad51-Dmc1 in Homolog Template Bias and Robust Homeostatic Regulation

Author

Jessica P. Lao,# 1 , 2 Veronica Cloud,# 3 , 4 Chu-Chun Huang, 1 Jennifer Grubb, 4 Drew Thacker, 5 , 6 Chih-Ying Lee, 7 Michael E. Dresser, 7 , 8 Neil Hunter, 1 , 2 , 9 , 10 , * and Douglas K. Bishop 3 , 4 , 11 , * Michael Lichten, Editor

Publish date

2013 Dec


Description :

Empty ...