We Offer Worldwide Shipping
Login Wishlist

Sagittatoside A

$1,344

Brand : BIOFRON
Catalogue Number : BD-P0736
Specification : 99.0%(HPLC&TLC)
CAS number : 118525-35-2
Formula : C33H40O15
Molecular Weight : 676.662
PUBCHEM ID : 13916054
Volume : 25mg

Available on backorder

Quantity
Checkout Bulk Order?

Catalogue Number

BD-P0736

Analysis Method

HPLC,NMR,MS

Specification

99.0%(HPLC&TLC)

Storage

2-8°C

Molecular Weight

676.662

Appearance

Yellow powder

Botanical Source

Epimedium sagittatum

Structure Type

Flavonoids

Category

SMILES

CC1C(C(C(C(O1)OC2=C(OC3=C(C2=O)C(=CC(=C3CC=C(C)C)O)O)C4=CC=C(C=C4)OC)OC5C(C(C(C(O5)CO)O)O)O)O)O

Synonyms

3-[(2S,3R,4R,5R,6S)-4,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-3-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxyoxan-2-yl]oxy-5,7-dihydroxy-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-8-(3-methylbut-2-enyl)chromen-4-one

IUPAC Name

3-[(2S,3R,4R,5R,6S)-4,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-3-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxyoxan-2-yl]oxy-5,7-dihydroxy-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-8-(3-methylbut-2-enyl)chromen-4-one

Density

1.6±0.0 g/cm3

Solubility

Soluble in Chloroform,Dichloromethane,Ethyl Acetate,DMSO,Acetone,etc.

Flash Point

295.8±0.0 °C

Boiling Point

933.3±0.0 °C at 760 mmHg

Melting Point

InChl

InChI=1S/C33H40O15/c1-13(2)5-10-17-18(35)11-19(36)21-24(39)30(28(46-29(17)21)15-6-8-16(43-4)9-7-15)47-33-31(26(41)22(37)14(3)44-33)48-32-27(42)25(40)23(38)20(12-34)45-32/h5-9,11,14,20,22-23,25-27,31-38,40-42H,10,12H2,1-4H3/t14-,20+,22-,23+,25-,26+,27+,31+,32-,33-/m0/s1

InChl Key

COHHGQPQHHUMDG-WVQJJEIESA-N

WGK Germany

RID/ADR

HS Code Reference

2933990000

Personal Projective Equipment

Correct Usage

For Reference Standard and R&D, Not for Human Use Directly.

Meta Tag

provides coniferyl ferulate(CAS#:118525-35-2) MSDS, density, melting point, boiling point, structure, formula, molecular weight etc. Articles of coniferyl ferulate are included as well.>> amp version: coniferyl ferulate

No Technical Documents Available For This Product.

PMID

22006969

Abstract

Opportunities to conduct large-scale field experiments are rare, but provide a unique opportunity to reveal the complex processes that operate within natural ecosystems. Here, we review the design of existing, large-scale forest fragmentation experiments. Based on this review, we develop a design for the Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems (SAFE) Project, a new forest fragmentation experiment to be located in the lowland tropical forests of Borneo (Sabah, Malaysia). The SAFE Project represents an advance on existing experiments in that it: (i) allows discrimination of the effects of landscape-level forest cover from patch-level processes; (ii) is designed to facilitate the unification of a wide range of data types on ecological patterns and processes that operate over a wide range of spatial scales; (iii) has greater replication than existing experiments; (iv) incorporates an experimental manipulation of riparian corridors; and (v) embeds the experimentally fragmented landscape within a wider gradient of land-use intensity than do existing projects. The SAFE Project represents an opportunity for ecologists across disciplines to participate in a large initiative designed to generate a broad understanding of the ecological impacts of tropical forest modification.

KEYWORDS

Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project, Calling Lake Fragmentation Experiment, deforestation, hierarchical sampling design, Savannah River Site Corridor Experiment, Wog Wog Habitat Fragmentation Experiment

Title

A large-scale forest fragmentation experiment: the Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems Project

Author

Robert M. Ewers,1,* Raphael K. Didham,2,3,4 Lenore Fahrig,5 Goncalo Ferraz,6,7 Andy Hector,8 Robert D. Holt,9 Valerie Kapos,10,11 Glen Reynolds,12 Waidi Sinun,13 Jake L. Snaddon,8,11 and Edgar C. Turner1,11

Publish date

2011 Nov 27;

PMID

25958811

Abstract

A model linking within- and between-host pathogen dynamics via pathogen shedding (emission of pathogens throughout the course of infection) is developed, and several aspects of host availability and co-infection are considered. In this model, the rate of pathogen shedding affects both the pathogen population size within a host (also affecting host mortality) and the rate of infection of new hosts. Our goal is to ascertain how the rate of shedding is likely to evolve, and what factors permit coexistence of alternative shedding rates in a pathogen population. For a constant host population size (where an increase in infected hosts necessarily decreases susceptible hosts), important differences arise depending on whether pathogens compete only for susceptible (uninfected) hosts, or whether co-infection allows for competition for infected hosts. With no co-infection, the pathogen type that can persist with the lowest number of susceptible hosts will outcompete any other, which under the assumptions of the model is the pathogen with the highest basic reproduction number. This is often a pathogen with a relatively high shedding rate (s). If within-host competition is allowed, a trade-off develops due to the conflicting effects of shedding on within- and between-host pathogen dynamics, with within-host competition favoring clones with low shedding rates while between-host competition benefits clones with higher shedding rates. With within-host competition for the same host cells, low shedding rate clones should eliminate high-s clones in a co-infected host, if equilibrium is reached. With co-infection, but no within-host competition, pathogen clones still interact by affecting the mortality of co-infected hosts; here, coexistence is more likely. With co-infection, two clones can coexist if one is the superior competitor for uninfected hosts and the other for co-infected hosts.

KEYWORDS

pathogen dynamics, shedding, co-infection, limited host population

Title

The role of pathogen shedding in linking within- and between-host pathogen dynamics

Author

Michael Barfield,1,* Maria E. Orive,2 and Robert D. Holt1

Publish date

2016 Dec 1.

PMID

31848420

Abstract

Extant Crocodylia are exceptional because they employ almost the full range of quadrupedal footfall patterns (“gaits”) used by mammals; including asymmetrical gaits such as galloping and bounding. Perhaps this capacity evolved in stem Crocodylomorpha, during the Triassic when taxa were smaller, terrestrial, and long-legged. However, confusion about which Crocodylia use asymmetrical gaits and why persists, impeding reconstructions of locomotor evolution. Our experimental gait analysis of locomotor kinematics across 42 individuals from 15 species of Crocodylia obtained 184 data points for a wide velocity range (0.15-4.35 ms−1). Our results suggest either that asymmetrical gaits are ancestral for Crocodylia and lost in the alligator lineage, or that asymmetrical gaits evolved within Crocodylia at the base of the crocodile line. Regardless, we recorded usage of asymmetrical gaits in 7 species of Crocodyloidea (crocodiles); including novel documentation of these behaviours in 5 species (3 critically endangered). Larger Crocodylia use relatively less extreme gait kinematics consistent with steeply decreasing athletic ability with size. We found differences between asymmetrical and symmetrical gaits in Crocodylia: asymmetrical gaits involved greater size-normalized stride frequencies and smaller duty factors (relative ground contact times), consistent with increased mechanical demands. Remarkably, these gaits did not differ in maximal velocities obtained: whether in Alligatoroidea or Crocodyloidea, trotting or bounding achieved similar velocities, revealing that the alligator lineage is capable of hitherto unappreciated extreme locomotor performance despite a lack of asymmetrical gait usage. Hence asymmetrical gaits have benefits other than velocity capacity that explain their prevalence in Crocodyloidea and absence in Alligatoroidea—and their broader evolution.

Subject terms: Evolution, Biomechanics, Herpetology

Title

Divergent evolution of terrestrial locomotor abilities in extant Crocodylia

Author

John R. Hutchinson,corresponding author1 Dean Felkler,1 Kati Houston,2 Yu-Mei Chang,3 John Brueggen,2 David Kledzik,2 and Kent A. Vliet2,4

Publish date

2019